???global.info.a_carregar???
Roberto Merrill is Assistant Professor in the Philosophy Department at the University of Minho, where he coordinates the MA in Political Philosophy. He is also a researcher at the Centre for Ethics, Politics and Society (CEPS), where he co-coordinates UBIEXP, a research project on Unconditional Basic Income. He is invited Professor in the MA in Public Policies at ISCTE (University of Lisbon) and an Associate Researcher at CEVIPOF (Sciences Po-Paris). He is a Member of the Executive Committee of the Research Committee on Political Philosophy of the International Political Science Association. Dr. Merrill research interests within political philosophy include liberal neutrality, perfectionism and value pluralism, as well as contemporary theories of distributive justice. He published in 2019 a book on unconditional basic income and is currently working on a book manuscript on pre-distribution and property-owning democracy.
Identificação

Identificação pessoal

Nome completo
Roberto Merrill

Nomes de citação

  • Merrill, Roberto

Identificadores de autor

Ciência ID
B416-BF50-11F6
ORCID iD
0000-0002-4388-8682

Endereços de correio eletrónico

  • nrbmerrill@gmail.com (Profissional)

Websites

  • https://sites.google.com/view/nrbmerrill/ (Profissional)

Domínios de atuação

  • Humanidades - Filosofia, Ética e Religião - Ética
Formação
Grau Classificação
2008
Concluído
Filosofia (Doutoramento)
Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, França
"Neutralité politiques et Pluralisme des valeurs" (TESE/DISSERTAÇÃO)
Percurso profissional

Docência no Ensino Superior

Categoria Profissional
Instituição de acolhimento
Empregador
2017/06/01 - Atual Professor Auxiliar (Docente Universitário) Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Projetos

Projeto

Designação Financiadores
2018 - 2021/04/30 THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AND EPISTEMOLOGY OF BASIC INCOME EXPERIMENTS: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION
PTDC/FER-FIL/28078/2017
Universidade do Minho, Portugal

Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
2011 - 2014/06/30 Redefining Democracy for the XXI century
PTDC/FIL-ETI/109984/2009
Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
2007 - 2010/09/30 Moral Evaluation of Controversial Technologies. From Individual Moral Intuitions and Values to the Collective Production of Norms in a Pluralist Context.
PTDC/FIL/80642/2006
Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Produções

Publicações

Artigo em revista
  1. Roberto Merrill; Gonçalo Marcelo. "Como Implementar e Financiar um Rendimento Básico Incondicional? Reflexões para o Caso Português e Proposta de Um Projeto-piloto". Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74 2-3 (2018): 585-626. https://doi.org/10.17990/RPF/2018_74_2_0585.
    10.17990/RPF/2018_74_2_0585
  2. Roberto Merrill. "Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste ?". Raisons politiques 44 4 (2011): 15-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rai.044.0015.
    10.3917/rai.044.0015
Capítulo de livro
  1. Merrill, Roberto; Savidan, Patrick. "Avant-propos [Du minimalisme moral. Essais pour Ruwen Ogien]". Portugal: Editions Raison publique,
Livro
  1. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. Ronald Dworkin et la neutralité de l’État. Portugal: Classiques Garnier. 2017.
    10.15122/isbn.978-2-406-06840-2.p.0099
  2. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. El acceso a los comunes y la renta básica como formas complementares de justicia predistributiva. Portugal: Editorial Grupo 5. 2017.
  3. Roberto Merrill; Daniel Weinstock. Political Neutrality. Nature Publishing Group. 2014.
    10.1057/9781137319203
  4. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil, ed. lit.; Weinstock, Daniel, ed. lit.. Political Neutrality: A Re-evaluation. Portugal: Palgrave Macmillan. 2014.
    10.1057/9781137319203
  5. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. Minorités illibérales, droits de sortie et neutralité de l'État: le pluralisme libéral entre tolérance et autonomie. Portugal: Hermann. 2013.
  6. Rosas, João Cardoso; Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. Ética, tecnologia e democracia: a avaliação de tecnologias controversas em conferências de cidadãos. Portugal: Húmus. 2011.
Revisão de livro
  1. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. "Liberal ou paternalista? Será que os surfistas devem ser subsidiados? Martim Avillez Figueiredo, Alêtheia, 2013. 180 pp.". http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47738.
  2. Merrill,Roberto. "Igualdade sem responsabilidade? Comentário a ¿justiça social e igualdade de oportunidades¿ (capítulo III)". http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0807-89672013000200020.
  3. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. "[Book reviews] Simon Birnbaum - "Basic income reconsidered: social justice, liberalism, and the demands of equality". New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 246 pp.". http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47737.
  4. Merrill,Roberto. "Liberal ou paternalista? Será que os surfistas devem ser subsidiados?". http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0807-89672013000200027.
Tese / Dissertação
  1. Loureiro, Marco Daniel Costa. "A teoria ideal da justiça num mundo não ideal". Mestrado, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/41532.

Outros

Outra produção
  1. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2017. Democracia de proprietários, prédistribuição, e rendimento básico incondicional. In this article I begin by exposing the theme of property-owning democracy, from John Rawls to its republican beginnings, examining its theoretical foundations and its institutional implications. I then argue that a property-owning democracy can be justified as a form of pre-distributive justice. Finally, I advocate unconditional basic income as an example of a desirable pre-distributive public po. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/46318.
    10.17990/rpf/2017_73_1_0049
  2. Baptista, António L. Silva; Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2015. Introduction to Property-Owning Democracy. Property-Owning Democracy. [Excerpt] 1. Inequality, democracy and the philosophical debate on economic alternatives Inequality has been on the rise for the past three decades and the pace at which it has been progressing has accelerated vertiginously in the past twenty years (Piketty, 2014; Atkinson, 2015).[1] The fall of the URSS and, with it, of the “socialist threat” and the market globalizatio. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/46818.
  3. Baptista,António; Merrill,Roberto. 2015. Introduction to Property-Owning Democracy. http://www.scielo.mec.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0807-89672015000200002.
  4. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2015. Justice et paternalisme dans les essais précoces en cancérologie. Some recent discussions on clinical research ethics such as early cancer trials drew attention to the paternalistic nature of the ethical framework necessary to protect the interests of people. More specifically, it has been suggested by some authors that a clinical trial which requires a high level of risk research should be considered ethically unacceptable. In this article, I begin by outlining. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/46821.
    10.1016/j.etiqe.2015.07.003
  5. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2014. L’amour comme émotion morale? Partialité parentale et égalité des chances. Introduction Partialité parentale et égalité des chances Quelles relations justifient la partialité de l’amour parental ? Mitiger ou neutraliser les inégalités des chances provoquées par l’amour ? Trois théories sur l’amour Que veut dire : « aimer quelqu’un » ? L’amour comme désir L’amour comme émotion L’amour comme relation Le conflit entre amour et morale Amour parental en tant que création de v. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47733.
  6. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2013. Igualdade sem responsabilidade? Comentário a "Justiça social e igualdade de oportunidades". No terceiro capítulo do seu livro Futuro indefinido: Ensaios de Filosofia Política, (Braga, 2012), intitulado “Justiça social e igualdade de oportunidades”, o Professor João Cardoso Rosas começa por distinguir entre a justiça social e outros conceitos de justiça (recti6 cativa, retributiva e distributiva). De seguida, concentra a sua atenção num dos princípios da justiça social, o princípio de igu. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47740.
  7. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2013. Introduction: art and ethics. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47739.
    10.2143/EP.20.3.2992654
  8. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2011. Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste?. In this article I defend that liberal perfectionism, even when paternalistic, is compatible with state neutrality. I defend this compatibility as follows. First, I distinguish three types of neutrality. Then, I distinguish three types of paternalism. I then examine under what conditions neutrality and paternalism can be compatible. Finally, I argue that neutrality of consequences, which seems to b. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47734.
    Merrill, R. (2011). Comment un État libéral peut-il être à la fois neutre et paternaliste ?. Raisons politiques, 44,(4), 15-40. doi:10.3917/rai.044.0015.
  9. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2010. Le néo-républicanisme en débat. Le républicanisme recouvre généralement deux signifi cations : la première, courante en théorie politique, consiste à voir dans le républicanisme une idéologie politique opposée à la monarchie. C’est typiquement le sens qu’il revêt lors des Révolutions américaine et française du 18e siècle. La république est alors conçue comme une forme de gouvernement dans laquelle les détenteurs du pouvoir polit. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47736.
  10. Bourdeau, Vincent; Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2009. Introduction: le libertarisme de gauche en débat. [Extrato] Que la Théorie de la justice de John Rawls (1971), aux débuts des années soixante-dix, ait renouvelé non seulement la manière de faire de la philosophie politique, mais aussi donné un nouveau contenu à toute réflexion en ce domaine, est un point qui semble communément accepté. Robert Nozick fut l’un des premiers à en faire le constat dans Anarchie, État et Utopie (1974), signalant qu’il. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47743.
  11. Merrill, Nathaniel Roberto Buil. 2009. Responsabilidade individual e justiça social: igualdade de oportunidades ou de resultados?. De acordo com qualquer tipo de igualitarismo sensível à responsabilidade individual, as desigualdades de riqueza entre indivíduos são justificadas quando resultantes de escolhas pelas quais os indivíduos podem ser considerados responsáveis. Inversamente, as desigualdades causadas apenas pelo acaso ou pela má sorte bruta não são justificadas. Esta característica é importante porque, conquanto se tr. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/47745.