???global.info.a_carregar???
I am an Associate Professor in the Reasoning and Argumentation Lab, NOVA Institute of Philosophy and the Department of Communication, NOVA University Lisbon. After dual master's training (philosophy, communication) I received my PhD in Humanities – Argumentation Theory from the University of Amsterdam (UvA) in 2010. From 2010 to 2016 I worked as a post-doctoral fellow of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), and then as an Assistant Professor between 2016 and 2023. My work focuses on the basic issues in the philosophy of language and argumentation theory such as rationality of everyday conversations, practical reasoning, pragmatic meaning, social and strategic aspects of speech acts, fallacies. Within this range of issues, I apply philosophical concepts of (practical) rationality, speech acts, and various forms of disagreement to study the mechanisms and norms of public argumentation, with a focus on potential abuses of language in the socially important contexts of environmental, health, and broadly political controversies. I teach Philosophy / Theory of Communication, Argumentation, and Methodology courses and supervise PhD students and post-doc researchers. As the Main Proposer and Action Chair, I lead the COST Action project CA17132, "European Network for Argumentation and Public Policy Analysis" (APPLY, 2018-2023, € 772.707), where philosophical and linguistic concepts and methods were applied to a critical study of public argument. From 2017 to 2019 I was a PI of "Ecological reasoning and decision making in innovation-oriented industry sectors at the periphery of Europe: Reconciling divergent values and interests", an international project co-funded by the Portuguese (FCT) and Turkish (TÜBITAK) science foundations, and from 2021-2024, a PI of the Portuguese team of the CHIST-ERA project "Argumentation-driven explainable artificial intelligence for digital medicine" (ANTIDOTE: CHIST-ERA/002/2019). These projects situate philosophical inquiry in the context of key societal challenges (climate change, health). My most recent publications include papers on "Illocutionary pluralism" (Synthese, 2021) and on "Conclusions of practical argument" (Organon F, 2021). In 2023 I published a monograph "Argumentation in Complex Communication" with the Cambridge University Press, (co-authored with Mark Aakhus, Rutgers University), the winner of the 2023 “Distinguished Book Award” (Book of the Year) of the Philosophy of Communication Division of the National Communication Association. My current research revolves around the issues of plural and duplicitous speech acts, verbal and conceptual disagreements, explanations and explanatory dialogues, the concept of argument, and the challenges of online communication to our theories of (rational) conversation. All these lines of work converge on the question of the rational quality of public debates. I have regularly published and edited volumes and special issues of journals with main academic publishers such as Cambridge University Press, Springer Nature, and John Benjamins. As of 2023, I serve as an Associate Editor of "Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy", responsible for its "Philosophy of Argument" Section. I am a member of the Editorial Board of "Argumentation" (Springer) and "Argumentation and Advocacy" (Routledge). I seat on the five-person Ethics Committee of the School of Social Sciences and Humanities of the NOVA University Lisbon (NOVA FCSH).
Identificação

Identificação pessoal

Nome completo
Marcin Lewinski

Nomes de citação

  • Lewinski, Marcin

Identificadores de autor

Ciência ID
121E-9C71-DFB4
ORCID iD
0000-0002-7218-3948
Google Scholar ID
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=s0ZL2y0AAAAJ&hl=en
Researcher Id
I-8809-2013
Scopus Author Id
24067084700

Domínios de atuação

  • Humanidades - Filosofia, Ética e Religião - Filosofia
  • Humanidades - Filosofia, Ética e Religião - Filosofia

Idiomas

Idioma Conversação Leitura Escrita Compreensão Peer-review
Português Utilizador proficiente (C1) Utilizador proficiente (C1) Utilizador proficiente (C1) Utilizador proficiente (C1)
Polaco Utilizador proficiente (C2) Utilizador proficiente (C2) Utilizador proficiente (C2) Utilizador proficiente (C2)
Inglês Utilizador proficiente (C2) Utilizador proficiente (C2) Utilizador proficiente (C2) Utilizador proficiente (C2)
Formação
Grau Classificação
2010/06/11
Concluído
Argumentation Theory (Doctor of Philosophy)
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Países Baixos
"Internet political discussion forums as an argumentative activity type: A pragma-dialectical analysis of online forms of strategic manoeuvring with critical reactions" (TESE/DISSERTAÇÃO)
No grade
2006/08/30
Concluído
Philosophy: Discourse and Argumentation Studies (Master)
Universiteit van Amsterdam, Países Baixos
"Internet as a sphere of argumentative activity types" (TESE/DISSERTAÇÃO)
8.7 - cum laude
2002/06/10
Concluído
Journalism and social communication (Master)
Uniwersytet Wroclawski, Polónia
"The construction of an idol's image in popular media" (TESE/DISSERTAÇÃO)
Very good
2000/06/20
Concluído
Journalism and social communication (Bachelor)
Uniwersytet Wroclawski, Polónia
"Image in popular culture" (TESE/DISSERTAÇÃO)
Very good
Percurso profissional

Ciência

Categoria Profissional
Instituição de acolhimento
Empregador
2022/09/01 - 2022/10/31 Investigador visitante (Investigação) University of Cambridge Faculty of Philosophy, Reino Unido
University of Cambridge Faculty of Philosophy, Reino Unido
2010/09/01 - 2016/08/31 Pós-doutorado (Investigação) Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
2006/09/01 - 2010/06/11 Assistente de Investigação (carreira) (Investigação) Universiteit van Amsterdam Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen, Países Baixos
Universiteit van Amsterdam Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen, Países Baixos

Docência no Ensino Superior

Categoria Profissional
Instituição de acolhimento
Empregador
2023/11/20 - Atual Professor Associado (Docente Universitário) Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
2016/09/01 - 2023/11/19 Professor Auxiliar (Docente Universitário) Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
Projetos

Bolsa

Designação Financiadores
2015/09/01 - 2017/08/31 Practical argumentation in the European energy and climate debates: Values, argumentative strategies, and discursive representations across Europe
NOVA FCSH PE 2015
Investigador responsável
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas
Concluído
2011/05 - 2016/08 ARGUMENTATION IN THE VIRTUAL PUBLIC SPHERE: BETWEEN IDEAL MODELS AND ACTUAL PRACTICES
Provided by PTCRIS: SFRH/BPD/74541/2010
Investigador responsável
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Projeto

Designação Financiadores
2021/04/01 - 2024/07/31 Argumentation-driven explainable artificial intelligence for digital medicine
Investigador responsável
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
CHIST-ERA

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Em curso
2021/04 - 2024/07 Inteligência artificial explicável para a medicina digital apoiada em argumentação
168303PRJ
Investigador responsável
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Em curso
2021/01 - 2023/12 Implicit Meaning in Argumentation: Functions, Usages and Norms (IMAFUN) Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung
2018/10/19 - 2022/10/18 European network for argumentation and public policy analysis
Investigador responsável
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal

Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
European Cooperation in Science and Technology

Horizon 2020
Em curso
2016/06/01 - 2019/08/31 Values in Argumentative Discourse
PTDC/MHC-FIL/0521/2014
Investigador
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal

Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.
Concluído
2017/02/01 - 2019/03/31 Ecological reasoning and decision making in innovation-oriented industry sectors at the periphery of Europe: Reconciling divergent values and interests
TUBITAK/0010/2014
Investigador responsável
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal

Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Concluído
2016/01 - 2018/12 Democracy in times of crisis: Power and Discourse in a three-level game
Investigador
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.
2011/03 - 2014/09 Argumentation, Communication and Context
PTDC/FIL-FIL/110117/2009
Investigador
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal

Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P.

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Concluído
Produções

Publicações

Artigo em conferência
  1. Bodlovic, Petar; Lewinski, Marcin; Villata, S.; Cabrio, E.. Autor correspondente: Bodlovic, Petar. "Explanatory dialogues and digital medicine". Trabalho apresentado em The 10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), Leiden, 2023.
    No prelo
  2. Lewinski, Marcin. Autor correspondente: Lewinski, Marcin. "The concept of argument: Revisited and reengineered". Trabalho apresentado em The cognitive dimension of social argumentation: The 4th European Conference on Argumentation, Rome 2022, Rome, 2022.
    No prelo
  3. Lewinski, Marcin. Autor correspondente: Lewinski, Marcin. "Metalinguistic disagreements, underdetermination and the straw man fallacy: Toward meaning argumentativism". Trabalho apresentado em Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity: The 12th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), Windsor, 2020.
    Publicado
  4. Lewinski, Marcin. Autor correspondente: Lewinski, Marcin. "Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues". Trabalho apresentado em Reason to Dissent: The 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, Groningen 2019, Groningen, 2019.
    Publicado
  5. Marcin Lewinski. "Commentary on Krabbe and van Laar’s In the Quagmire of Quibbles". 2018.
  6. Cassandra Oliveras-Moreno; Mark Aakhus; Marcin Lewinski. "Apologia in a Networked Society". 2018.
  7. Marcin Lewinski. "Where is the reasonable? Objectivity and bias of practical argument". 2016.
  8. Marcin Lewinski. "How to conclude practical argument in a multi-party debate: A speech act analysis". 2016.
  9. Dale Hample; Marcin Lewinski; João de Deus Santos Sàágua; Dima Mohammed. "A descriptive and comparative analysis of arguing in Portugal". 2016.
  10. Marcin Lewinski. "Commentary on Paul L. Simard Smith’s “Pluralism as a Bias Mitigation Strategy”". 2016.
  11. Marcin Lewinski; Mark Aakhus. "Toward polylogical analysis of argumentation:". 2015.
  12. Marcin Lewinski. "Practical reasoning and multi-party deliberation: The best, the good enough and the necessary". 2015.
Artigo em revista
  1. Álvaro Domínguez-Armas; Andrés Soria-Ruiz; Marcin Lewinski. "Provocative Insinuations as Hate Speech: Argumentative Functions of Mentioning Ethnicity in Headlines". Topoi (2023): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09894-6.
    10.1007/s11245-023-09894-6
  2. Marcin Lewinski; Bianca Cepollaro; Steve Oswald; Maciej Witek. "Norms of Public Argument: A Speech Act Perspective". Topoi (2023): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09918-1.
    10.1007/s11245-023-09918-1
  3. Frank Zenker; Jan Albert van Laar; B. Cepollaro; A. Gâta; M. Hinton; C. G. King; B. Larson; et al. "Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation". Argumentation (2023): https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09598-6.
    10.1007/s10503-023-09598-6
  4. Marcin Lewinski. "Challenging Authority with Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Arguments from and to Authority". Languages (2022): https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030207.
    10.3390/languages7030207
  5. Marcin Lewinski. "Speech Act Pluralism in Argumentative Polylogues". Informal Logic (2021): https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i3.6855.
    10.22329/il.v41i3.6855
  6. Marcin Lewinski. "Conclusions of practical argument". Organon F 28 2 (2021): 420-457. https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/publications/bfecfbd5-af20-49c9-9ca3-1cfbc88f3e3a.
    10.31577/orgf.2021.28207
  7. Marcin Lewinski. "Illocutionary pluralism". Synthese (2021): https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03087-7.
    10.1007/s11229-021-03087-7
  8. Marcin Lewinski. "Social Situations and Which Descriptions". Logos and Episteme 11 4 (2020): 517-526. https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/publications/83d1a648-2bde-45a7-b2a2-980a74a215b1.
    10.5840/LOGOS-EPISTEME202011439
  9. Marcin Lewinski. "Argumentative Discussion: The Rationality of What?". Topoi 38 4 (2019): 645-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-015-9361-0.
    10.1007/s11245-015-9361-0
  10. Lewinski, M.; Üzelgün, M.A.. "Environmental argumentation". Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 1 (2019): 1-11. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85067066930&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1075/jaic.00004.int
  11. Lewinski, M.; Mohammed, D.. "The 2015 Paris Climate Conference: Arguing for the fragile consensus in global multilateral diplomacy". Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 1 (2019): 65-90. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85067024064&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1075/jaic.18017.lew
  12. Rodrigues, S.; Lewinski, M.; Üzelgün, M.A.. "Environmental manifestoes: Argumentative strategies in the Ecomodernist Manifesto". Journal of Argumentation in Context 8 1 (2019): 12-39. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85066996653&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1075/jaic.18036.rod
  13. Marcin Lewinski; Dale Hample; João Sàágua; Dima Mohammed. "Arguing in Portugal: A cross-cultural analysis". Journal of International and Intercultural Communication (2018): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2018.1450888.
    10.1080/17513057.2018.1450888
  14. Lewinski, M.; Lewinski, Marcin; Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA). "Practical argumentation as reasoned advocacy". Informal Logic 37 2 (2017): 85-113. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85020393032&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.22329/il.v37i2.4775
  15. Lewinski, M.. "Argumentation Theory Without Presumptions". Argumentation 31 3 (2017): 591-613. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85012195569&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1007/s10503-017-9421-2
  16. Aakhus, M.; Lewinski, M.. "Advancing Polylogical Analysis of Large-Scale Argumentation: Disagreement Management in the Fracking Controversy". Argumentation 31 1 (2017): 179-207. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84973115736&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1007/s10503-016-9403-9
  17. UZELGUN, MEHMET ALI; Lewinski, Marcin; Castro, P.. "Favorite Battlegrounds of Climate Action: Arguing About Scientific Consensus, Representing Science-Society Relations". Science Communication 38 6 (2016): 699-723. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85001975508&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    Publicado • 10.1177/1075547016676602
  18. Lewinski, M.. "Shale gas debate in Europe: Pro-and-con dialectics and argumentative polylogues". Discourse and Communication 10 6 (2016): 553-575. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84996486749&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1177/1750481316674773
  19. Uzelgun, M.A.; Mohammed, D.; Lewinski, M.; Castro, P.. "Managing disagreement through yes, but... constructions: An argumentative analysis". Discourse Studies 17 4 (2015): 467-484. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84938225805&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    Publicado • 10.1177/1461445615578965
  20. Lewinski, Marcin. "Argumentative polylogues: Beyond dialectical understanding of fallacies". Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 1 (2014): 193-218. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84900828028&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    Acesso aberto • Publicado • 10.2478/slgr-2014-0010
  21. Marcin Lewinski. "Practical reasoning in argumentative polylogues". Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación 1 20 (2014): 2172-8801. https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/publications/f02d88bd-0a64-44f3-a280-1587d2b36d56.
  22. Lewinski, M.; Aakhus, M.. "Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry". Argumentation 28 2 (2014): 161-185. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84899989188&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1007/s10503-013-9307-x
  23. Lewiſski, Marcin. "Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: Sides, positions, and cases". Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 1 (2013): 151-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.2.1.07lew.
    10.1075/jaic.2.1.07lew
  24. Lewiſski, Marcin; Mohammed, Dima. "Argumentation in political deliberation". Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 1 (2013): 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.2.1.00int.
    10.1075/jaic.2.1.00int
  25. Lewinski, M.; Oswald, S.. "When and how do we deal with straw men? A normative and cognitive pragmatic account". Journal of Pragmatics 59 (2013): 164-177. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84897070333&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.001
  26. Dima Mohammed; Marcin Lewinski. "Deliberate Design or Unintended Consequences: The Argumentative Uses of Facebook During the Arab Spring". Journal Of Public Deliberation 8(1) NA (2012): Article 11 (13pag)-Article 11 (13pag). https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/publications/15afb97c-154c-414b-83d1-1bcf318549c9.
  27. Lewinski, M.. "The Paradox of Charity". Informal Logic 32 4 (2012): 403-439. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84874097306&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
  28. Lewinski, Marcin. "Dialectical trade-offs in the design of protocols for computer-mediated deliberation". Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 23 36 (2011): 225-241. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84863970209&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    Acesso aberto
  29. Lewinski, M.. "Towards a Critique-Friendly Approach to the Straw Man Fallacy Evaluation". Argumentation 25 4 (2011): 469-497. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80053572719&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1007/s10503-011-9227-6
  30. Marcin Lewinski. "Collective Argumentative Criticism in Informal Online Discussion Forums". Argumentation And Advocacy 47 2 (2010): 86-105. https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/publications/63bb9b37-9618-49de-b7a0-fef97c2af706.
    10.1080/00028533.2010.11821740
  31. Lewinski, M.. "Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation". Argumentation 23 1 (2009): 123-126.
    10.1007/s10503-008-9111-1
  32. Lewinski, M.. "Comments on 'black box arguments'". Argumentation 22 3 (2008): 447-451. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-48349085386&partnerID=MN8TOARS.
    10.1007/s10503-008-9095-x
Capítulo de livro
  1. Lewinski, Marcin; C. Dutilh Novaes. Autor correspondente: Lewinski, Marcin. "The many-to-many model: Communication, attention, and trust in online conversations". In Conversations Online, editado por Goldberg, Sandy; Saul, Jennifer; Connolly, Patrick. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press, 2024.
    No prelo
  2. "Introduction: The Pandemic of Argumentation". 1-13. Springer International Publishing, 2022.
    10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_1
  3. Lewinski, Marcin; Abreu, Pedro. Autor correspondente: Lewinski, Marcin. "Arguing About "COVID": Metalinguistic Arguments on What Counts as a "COVID-19 Death"". 17-41. Springer International Publishing, 2022.
    Publicado • 10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_2
  4. Marcin Lewinski. "Practical Argumentation in the Making:". In Discursive Construction of Reasons for Action, editado por Steve Oswald; Thierry Herman; J{\'e, 219-241. SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG, 2018.
    10.1007/978-3-319-73972-4_10
  5. Marcin Lewinski. "Dialectics and polylogues: The case of multi-party deliberations". editado por {von Burg, 105-123. Windsor studies in argumentation, 2016.
  6. Marcin Lewinski. "Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: Sides, positions, and cases". editado por Marcin Lewinski; Dima Mohammed, 151-176. John Benjamins, 2015.
    10.1075/bct.76.07lew
  7. Marcin Lewinski; Dima Mohammed. "Introduction: Argumentation in Political Deliberation". editado por Marcin Lewinski; Dima Mohammed, 1-9. John Benjamins, 2015.
  8. Marcin Lewinski. "Pragmatics, cognitive heuristics and the straw man fallacy". editado por Herman Thierry; Oswald Steve, 313-343. Peter Lang, 2014.
  9. Marcin Lewinski. "Public deliberation as a polylogue: Challenges of argumentation analysis and evaluation". editado por Ribeiro, {Henrique Jales, 223-246. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012.
  10. Aakhus, M.; Lewinski, Marcin. "Argument analysis in large-scale deliberation". In Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, 165-184. 2011.
    Publicado • 10.1075/z.163.12aak
Edição de livro
  1. Oswald, S.; Lewinski, Marcin; S. Greco; Villata, S.. The Pandemic of Argumentation. Springer International Publishing. 2022.
    10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4
  2. Mohammed, Dima; Lewinski, Marcin. Argumentation and Reasoned Action: Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015. Vol. I & II. London, Reino Unido: College Publications. 2016.
    Publicado • Editor
  3. Marcin Lewinski; Dima Mohammed. Argumentation in Political Deliberation. John Benjamins. 2015.
    Publicado • 10.1075/bct.76 • Editor
  4. Mohammed, Dima; Lewinski, Marcin. Virtues of Argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), 22-26 May 2013.. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA). 2013.
Entrada de dicionário
  1. Lewinski, Marcin; Mohammed, Dima. "Argumentation Theory". In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy, editado por Jensen, {Klaus Bruhn. John Wiley and Sons, 2016. https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/publications/5887d4a6-fc74-42a2-b85f-735dbf4d2a06.
Livro
  1. Lewinski, M.; Aakhus, M.. ARGUMENTATION IN COMPLEX COMMUNICATION: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press. 2023.
    Publicado • 10.1017/9781009274364
  2. Lewinski, Marcin. Autor correspondente: Lewinski, Marcin. Internet political discussion forums as an argumentative activity type: A pragma-dialectical analysis of online forms of strategic manoeuvring with critical reactions. Amsterdam, Países Baixos: SicSat / Rozenberg Publishers. 2010.
    Publicado
Relatório
  1. Frank Zenker; Jan Albert von Laar; Pedro Abreu; M. Bengtsson; D. Castro; M. Cooke; I. Danka; et al. 2019. Goals and Functions of Public Argumentation. https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/publications/61fa2bed-91f3-481d-b806-a64db05add70.
Revisão de livro
  1. Marcin Lewinski. "Review of: Isabela Fairclough and Norman Fairclough, Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge (2012)". 6, 1 (2014): 169-175. https://novaresearch.unl.pt/en/publications/5e0c2ca2-533d-49cc-a3c2-2d7e38406276.
  2. Lewinski, Marcin. Autor correspondente: Lewinski, Marcin. "Review of: Douglas Walton, Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006". Revisão de Fundamentals of critical argumentation 23, 1 (2009): 123-126. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10503-008-9111-1.
    Publicado • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9111-1
Atividades

Apresentação oral de trabalho

Título da apresentação Nome do evento
Anfitrião (Local do evento)
2024/01/25 Triadic authority and metalinguistic appeals International workshop on “Authority and metalinguistic speech acts”
NOVA Institute of Philosophy, NOVA University Lisbon (Lisbon, Portugal)
2023/10/27 Illocutionary pluralism and doublespeak Workshop "Varieties of Misinformation"
VLC Philosophy Lab, Faculty of Philosophy and Education Sciences, University of Valencia (Valencia, Espanha)
2023/09/07 Plural illocutionary acts: Protesting, trolling, and doublespeak 15th Conference of the Italian Society for Analytic Philosophy – SIFA
University of Eastern Piedmont, Alessandria (Alessandria , Itália)
2023/07/07 Argumentative authority 10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation - ISSA
Leiden University (Leiden, Países Baixos)
2023/07/07 Explanatory dialogues and digital medicine 10th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation - ISSA
Leiden University (Leiden , Países Baixos)
2023/04/21 Advising Workshop: Themes from Jennifer Lackey’s work
NOVA Institute of Philosophy, NOVA University Lisbon (Lisbon, Portugal)
2023/01/27 Authority in public argumentation
Amsterdam Centre for Language and Communication (ACLC), University of Amsterdam (Amsterdam , Países Baixos)
2023/01/25 Soft power in argumentation: The case of advising The Theoretical Philosophy Colloquium
University of Groningen (Groningen, Países Baixos)
2022/11/28 Authority in public deliberation: An argumentation approach
Knowledge Media Institute, Open University (Milton Keynes, Reino Unido)
2022/09/30 The many-to-many model: Argumentation and trust in online conversations The 4th European Conference on Argumentation – ECA Rome 2022
Università di Roma Tre (Rome, Itália)
2022/09/28 The concept of argument: Revisited and reengineered The 4th European Conference on Argumentation – ECA Rome 2022
Università di Roma Tre (Rome, Itália)
2022/09/27 Negotiating authority in public discourse: The case of advising. Workshop on Speech Acts: Between Philosophy and Linguistics
Newnham College, University of Cambridge (Cambridge, Reino Unido)
2022/06/27 Authority in multi-party conversations: The case of advising International Workshop "Norms of Public Argument: A Speech Act Perspective"
NOVA Institute of Philosophy, NOVA University Lisbon (Lisbon, Portugal)
2022/04/27 Against best advice: The argumentative dynamics of advising in political discourse International Conference “Argumentation and Politics”
Department of Philosophy I, University of Granada (Granada, Espanha)
2022/04/04 Advice: Between authority and argumentation
Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM) (Madrid, Espanha)
2021/11/11 Speech act pluralism in argumentation The 3rd International Conference "ARGAGE: Argumentation and Language"
University of Neuchâtel (Neuchâtel, Suiça)
2021/09/30 Metalinguistic arguments over what counts as a "COVID-19 death": What are institutional arguments about? International Workshop on “Argument technologies and public debate: The design perspective”
Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, CNR, Rome (Rome, Itália)
2020/06/04 Metalinguistic disagreements, underdetermination and the straw man fallacy: Toward meaning argumentativism The 12th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA): Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity
University of Windsor (Windsor, Canadá)
2020/02/12 Arguments, publics, and environments Annual seminar of the Center for Cultural Analysis, School of Arts and Sciences
Rutgers University, New Jersey (New Brunswick, Estados Unidos)
2019/07/12 Misunderstanding, Disagreement and the Interpretative Work of Argumentation International Workshop Merely—Meanings: Enduring, Revising, Engineering
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova Institute of Philosophy (Lisboa, Portugal)
2019/06/25 Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues 3rd European Conference on Argumentation: Reason to Dissent
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen (Groningen , Países Baixos)
2018/11/09 Speech act pluralism and polylogue International Workshop: "Perspectives on Speech as Action"
University of Trieste (Trieste, Itália)
2018/07/04 Disagreement, misunderstanding and the straw man fallacy: A polylogical perspective 9th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
International Society for the Study of Argumentation: University of Amsterdam (Amsterdam, Países Baixos)
2018/02/07 Indicators of practical argumentation in ecological reasoning International Conference "ARGAGE 2018: Argumentation and Language"
University of Lugano (Lugano, Suiça)
2017/05/12 Dualisms and dilemmas of argumentation theory Fifth International Conference on Philosophy of Language and Linguistics PhiLang2017
University of Lódz (Lódz, Polónia)
2017/05/04 Argumentation and Social Representation: A Productive Collaboration? International workshop on "Social Representations and Argumentation"
Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics (London, Reino Unido)
2016/09/07 Presumptions: A social ontology perspective Berkeley Social Ontology Group
UC Berkeley (Berkeley, CA, Estados Unidos)
2016/05/18 Where is the reasonable? Objectivity and bias of practical argument 11th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA)
University of Windsor: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), (Windsor, Canadá)
2016/04/28 Charity, acceptability and conversation: Argumentation theory without presumptions? International Conference "Presumptions, Presumptive Inferences and Burden of Proof"
Departamento de Filosofia I, University of Granada (Granada, Espanha)
2015/09/09 Practical argumentation in the making: Discursive construction of reasons for action International Conference "ARGAGE 2015: Argumentation and Language"
University of Lausanne (Lausanne, Suiça)
2015/06/10 How to conclude practical argument in a multi-party debate: A speech act analysis The 1st European Conference on Argumentation: "Argumentation and Reasoned Action"
NOVA Institute of Philosophy, NOVA University Lisbon (Lisbon, Portugal)
2014/07/04 Toward polylogical analysis of argumentation: Analyzing disagreement space in the public deliberation about fracking 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA)
University of Amsterdam (Amsterdam , Países Baixos)
2014/07/01 Practical reasoning and multi-party deliberation: The problem of the best means 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
University of Amsterdam: International Society for the Study of Argumentation (amsterdam, Países Baixos)
2013/12/05 Practical reasoning, deliberation and argumentative polylogues International Workshop "Argumentation and Rational Decisions"
NOVA Institute of Philosophy, NOVA University Lisbon (Lisbon, Portugal)
2013/08/03 Tweeting the Arab Spring: Argumentative polylogues in digital media The 18th NCA/AFA Alta Conference on Argumentation
University of Utah (Salt Lake City, Estados Unidos)
2012/06/26 Rationality and strategy in a polylogue: A preliminary investigation 14th Biennial Wake Forest University Argumentation Conference
Wake Forest University: Casa Artom (Venice, Itália)
2012/03/21 The paradox of charity ArgLab Research Colloquium
NOVA Institute of Philosophy, NOVA University Lisbon (Lisbon, Portugal)
2011/05/18 Monologue, dilogue, or polylogue: Which model for public deliberation? 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation
University of Windsor: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (Windsor, Canadá)
2011/01/26 When and how do we deal with straw men? International Conference Communication and Cognition: Manipulation, Persuasion and Deception in Language
University of Neuchâtel (Neuchâtel, Suiça)
2010/06/30 "The collective antagonist" – multiple criticisms in informal online deliberation 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA)
University of Amsterdam (Amsterdam , Países Baixos)
2009/06/04 "You're moving from irrelevant to irrational" – critical reactions in Internet discussion forums 8th Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA)
University of Windsor (Windsor, Canadá)

Orientação

Título / Tema
Papel desempenhado
Curso (Tipo)
Instituição / Organização
2022/02/01 - 2026/01/31 On the Rational Resolvability of Deep Disagreements
Orientador de Manuel J. Sanchís Ferrer
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal
2018/10/01 - 2025/09/30 Science Communication: A Practical Argumentation Approach for a Framework in EU-funded Research
Orientador
Ciências da Comunicação (Doutoramento)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal
2019/10/01 - 2024/09/30 These Words Hurt! Communicative Strategies to Counter Hate Speech
Orientador de Álvaro Dominguez-Armas
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal

Organização de evento

Nome do evento
Tipo de evento (Tipo de participação)
Instituição / Organização
2024/10 - Atual The First Workshop on "Argumentation for Explanations", 27th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI) (2024/10/19 - 2024/10/24)
Oficina (workshop) (Coorganizador)
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Espanha
2020/03 - Atual International Conference: "Reasons, Citizens, Institutions", University of Wroclaw, Poland (2020/03/04 - 2020/03/06)
Conferência (Coorganizador)
Uniwersytet Wroclawski, Polónia
2017/06 - Atual The 2nd European Conference on Argumentation: "Argumentation and Inference", University of Fribourg, Switzerland (2017/06/20 - 2017/06/23)
Conferência (Membro da Comissão Organizadora)
Université de Fribourg, Suiça
2015/06 - Atual Chair of the Organising Committee of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation: Argumentation and Reasoned Action¿, New University of Lisbon, Portugal, June 9-12 (www.ecargument.org). (2015/06/09 - 2015/06/12)
Congresso (Presidente da Comissão Organizadora)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
2024/01/25 - 2024/01/26 International workshop: Authority and metalinguistic speech acts, NOVA Institute of Philosophy, NOVA University Lisbon, Portugal, Keynote speakers: Quill R. Kukla (Georgetown University, US) Leo Townsend (University of Reading, UK) Nat Hansen (University of Reading, UK) https://authority-metalinguisticspeech.fcsh.unl.pt/ (2024/01/25 - 2024/01/26)
Oficina (workshop) (Presidente da Comissão Organizadora)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
2022/06/27 - 2022/06/29 International Workshop: Norms of Public Argument: A Speech Act Perspective Keynote speakers: Rae Langton, University of Cambridge, UK Mary Kate McGowan, Wellesley College, USA Jennifer Saul, University of Waterloo, CA Marina Sbisà, University of Trieste, IT Mitchell Green, University of Connecticut, USA https://publicpolicyargument.eu/events/call-for-papers-norms-of-public-argument-a-speech-act-perspective/ (2022/06/27 - 2022/06/29)
Oficina (workshop) (Presidente da Comissão Organizadora)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
2017/06/28 - 2017/06/29 International conference Values in Argumentation - Values of Argumentation Nova Institute of Philosophy, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal Keynote speakers: Jason Stanley (Yale University, USA) Christopher Tindale (University of Windsor, CA) (2017/06/28 - 2017/06/29)
Conferência (Coorganizador)
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal

Arbitragem científica em conferência

Nome da conferência Local da conferência
2018/09 - Atual The 16th ArgDiaP Conference "Argumentation and Corpus Linguistics" at WAW 2018 Institute for Philosophy & Sociology at the Polish Academy of Sciences (IFiS PAN), Warsaw, Poland
2018/02 - Atual 2nd International Conference "Argumentation & Language" University of Lugano, Switzerland
2017/02 - Atual International Conference "Communication and Cognition. Miscommunication: Getting Lost in Language(s)" University of Fribourg, Switzerland
2015/09 - Atual International Conference "Argumentation & Language: Linguistic Markers, Discursive Processes and Cognitive Operations" University of Lausanne, Switzerland
2011/01 - Atual International Conference "Communication and Cognition: Manipulation, Persuasion and Deception in Language" University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland
2024/06/25 - 2024/06/27 The 4th International Conference "Argumentation & Language": Pragmatics and Argumentation University of Fribourg, Switzerland
2022/09/28 - 2022/09/30 4th European Conference on Argumentation "ECA Rome 2022: The cognitive dimension of social argumentation" Università di Roma Tre
2020/03/04 - 2020/03/06 International Conference: "Reasons, Citizens, Institutions" University of Wroclaw, Poland
2019/06/24 - 2019/06/27 3rd European Conference on Argumentation: "Reason to Dissent" Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen

Arbitragem científica em revista

Nome da revista (ISSN) Editora
2023/01/01 - Atual TOPOI: An International Review of Philosophy (0167-7411) Springer
2015 - Atual Argumentation (1572-8374) Springer-Verlag
2013 - Atual Argumentation and Advocacy (2576-8476) Informa UK (Taylor & Francis)

Comissão de avaliação

Descrição da atividade
Tipo de assessoria
Instituição / Organização Entidade financiadora
2022/01/01 - Atual Evaluation of projects submitted to the European CO-operation in Science and Technology (COST) Association
Avaliador
European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Bélgica European Cooperation in Science and Technology
2020/12/01 - Atual Invited external expert for Project funding in humanities and social sciences, the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) (2020)
Especialista
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Suiça Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung
2020 - Atual Referee for NIAS Individual Fellowship 2021-22: The Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences
Avaliador
Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Países Baixos
2018 - Atual ERC Remote Referee for ERC Advanced Grant 2018: Philosophy (European Research Council)
Avaliador
European Research Council, Bélgica
2015 - Atual The Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) Expert Panel Referee: Philosophy and Ethics
Avaliador
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen, Bélgica

Curso / Disciplina lecionado

Disciplina Curso (Tipo) Instituição / Organização
2023/10/01 - Atual Communication for Social Change Ciências da Comunicação (Mestrado integrado) Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal
2017/02 - Atual Rhetoric and Argumentation (Licenciatura) Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal
2016/10 - Atual Theory of Communication (Doutoramento) Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal
2016/09 - Atual Philosophy of Communication (Licenciatura) Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal
2014/09 - Atual Methodology (Doutoramento) Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal

Membro de comissão

Descrição da atividade
Tipo de participação
Instituição / Organização
2022/09/01 - Atual Member of the NOVA School of Social Sciences and Humanities Ethics Committee
Membro
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Portugal
2013/12/05 - Atual Member of the Steering Committee of the European Conference on Argumentation
Membro
2017/10 - 2022/03/31 Member of the Scientific Council of the NOVA Institute of Philosophy: Chair of the Reasoning and Argumentation Lab
Membro
Universidade Nova de Lisboa Instituto de Filosofia, Portugal
Distinções

Prémio

2023 Winner of the 2023 "Distinguished Book Award" (Book of the Year) of the Philosophy of Communication Division of the National Communication Association for the book "Argumentation in complex communication" (Lewinski & Aakhus, 2023)
National Communication Association, Estados Unidos
2005 Huygens Scholarship
Nederlands organisatie voor internationale samenwerking in het hoger onderwijs, Países Baixos